the entire world, or at least small concentrations therein, is wondering how the u.s. is going to deal with the human health and environmental impacts from the toxic and festering floodwaters in which new orleans is submerged. well, to paraphrase a certain prophet, a crunchy bug will guide them.
this is partly true.
i mentioned, in passing, a hyper-frantic state around the office (here in ann arbor as well as in d.c.) regarding a request from epa headquarters to "examine" the issue of providing treatment for the waters that are now, as we sit here, being pumped at astounding rates into lake pontchartrain and various canals. it's easy enough to imagine the kinds of treatment processes that would be appropriate, but any attempt to put numbers to the flow rates involved (thousands of cubic feet per second, larger than the largest wastewater treatment plants in the world, and then some) produces ridiculous quantities of chemicals, numbers of floating aerators, and so on. realistic? the real priority is keeping bodies from clogging the pumps. although i am led to believe that the pumps the corps is using would pass bodies without any problem. there is just this respect for the dead thing.
anyway, i've been compelled to contemplate this for the past few days. but no amount of lsd ingested as a teenager could have fully prepared me for the conversation this afternoon, taking a call at 5:15 (instead of just getting up and leaving), from m.s. and j.w., over at epa, just to talk over the basic quantities of things to order, just to get started. assume we have to add 2.5 mg/L of dissolved oxygen to 9,000 cfs, get 25-50 100 HP aerators. then ten 3,000 gallon trucks of 15% hypochlorite. how much ferric chloride? i was embarrased not to be able to remember how much iron is in a gallon of 36% ferric chloride solution. but we're going to get 30,000 gallons of that, too, just to get started. oh yeah, and 100 tons of powdered activated carbon. bring it in by helicopter.
shitfire.
i hope this helps.
what we're thinking is that, for now anyway, the water is not all that horrible. but as they get down to the dregs, that's going to be nasty as fuck. it may require pumping it right into tankers and treating it offsite somewhere. i hope that will be someone else's design challenge. i turned down the possibility of traveling to nola, to be owm's point person to keep track of treatment efficiency. a) i am not really the person to do that, and 2) i think headquarters should limit their oversight to what they can do from washington; the locals will have enough to do without bureaucrats getting in the way.
it would be very weird to return to nola like that, in that capacity, in the middle of all this. i was last there in 1987, under very, very different circumstances. it would make a nice story, that trip.
you did not read any of this, because it is strictly confidential.
--->love bug